The capturing
Here I offer one short English language example of my theological
works. The Author is searching for possibility of MAKING THEM PUBLISHED
or simply personal communication. If anyone would express INTEREST OF
ANY KIND, please contact the Author on the following address: vvv
Александр Голенков, Кострома, Титова 9 - 57. tel: 54 - 45 - 31
Alexander Golenkov, Kostroma, Titova 9 - 57, Russia 156023.
--------------------------- + ----------------------------
v
I ask very much to treat this work of
mine very carefully, as a way to the
writing if it was very difficult, and
can be continued only with someone`s
help.
+
= T H E C A P T U R I N G =
* ------- *
+
NOTE FOR THE LANGUAGE APPLIED: This work of mine is BREAKING THE BEING
TO ITS VERY CORE, and - SO IS THE LANGUA-
GE, applied in it. It`s also "breaking
the words". There is no other way to de-
monstrate it most vividly. Practically,
it`s DIFFERENT LANGUAGE. Not "English";
not "Russian"; NOT HUMAN AT ALL. (See in
the Bible of "other tongues"…).
NOTE FOR THE TRANSLATION: Although, "PHYSICALLY" it had to be put into
"shell" of certain national language, extracting the "MOST OF
IT". For that matter, it is based in a very considerable ex-
tent on PLAYING OF RUSSIAN WORDS (begining with the very word
"Capturing", and so on…).
If it were written originally in English, it would do so too; - and IN
SOME PLACES DOES - as you will see it below; - but basically, there were
only two ways to translate it in English: Either to use some "CONVENTIO-
NAL" English set of words, but to lose the exactness of the IDEA STAN-
DING BEGIND, or to express it rather UNCONVENTIONALLY, but AS THE IDEA
REQUIRES, passing it "ONE TO ONE" in a linguistic form. THE SECOND WAY
IS PREFERRED HERE. Although these words may sound rather "bizzar" to an
ordinary English speaker, one has to realise that, IN THE SENCE OF IDEA,
those are VERY CATEGORICALLY EXACT THEOLOGICAL TERMS.
°°°°°°°±±±±±±"""""???? + ????"""""±±±±±±°°°°°°°
?----------------------------?
¦ | Shortest layout of my work | ¦
¦ | = THE CAPTURING = | ¦
¦ | ("ЗАХВАТЫВАЮЩЕЕ") | ¦
?----------------------------?
The "Capturing" is the NAME OF THE BEING (and not only the name of
this work of mine /the other ways for translating this Russian word are:
the "Breathtaking"; "Painstaking", "Exciting"; "CAPTURING THE ENTIRE AT-
TENTION"…/).
And really: The very first question put forward in the "Captu-
ring" is: What does one need just to BE ?…
The answer is:
°±"?? 1.) SOMETHING OF HIS OWN KIND (in the BEING WHICH ALREADY
EXISTS), the relation to which is CONFLUENT *1.
¦ (The most vivid example: The c o m i n g i n t o t h i s b e i n g
¦ t h r u t h e c o n?f l u e n t l i n e o f c o n?g e n e r i c
¦ s u c?c e s s i o n, - as ANY AT ALL CREATURE DOES /Spectacularilly,
¦ but the English word "KIND" is "OF ONE KIND" to "KIN", meaning a KIND
¦ OF CON?GENERIC COMMUNITY…/).
°±"?? 2.) SOMETHING OF DIFFERING KIND (in the "neighbouring" part of
the Being), the relation to which is SEPARATE.
¦ (This lets, back again, us most vividly to explain that well-known
¦ phenomenon, that ANY CREATURE, (new?)BORN IN THIS WORLD, AT CERTAIN
¦ POINT IN TIME is LEAVING HIS MATERNAL HOME (or, anyway, "HABITAT"),
¦ aspiring for the meeting with SOMETHING THE DIFFERING, to - having
¦ COLLIDFED ONESELF WITH the Differing - AQUIRE ONE`S OWN FACE; - as a
¦ "STAMP FROM THE FACE OF THE BEING", for: In the minute details of this
¦ Collision are - literally - being "forged out" the TRAITS OF HIS CARACTER [Latin word "natio" means, namely, "KIND"!], and
¦ what is called PERSONALITY (Russian word for "personality" is coming
¦ from one root with "FACE").
¦ || Just look: Every nation of this world had aquired its charac-
¦ || teristic national traits (its "SHAPES" and "FORMS") only as a
¦ || RESULT OF CERTAIN BATTLE in whiсh it had DIFFERED ITSELF ("SE-
¦ || PARATED") from all things around.
¦ And not only at the moment of that, but so ON: The peoples of this
¦ world are only searching pretexts for NEW COLLISIOUNS, for they need
¦ regullarily to "feed up" the entire of this "energetics of Being"…
¦ ?-----------? ).
¦ |with words" ?------------------
[By the margins like this "¦" are marked the "examples in
brackets", illustrating the Two Statements given above.]
And so: 2.) The STATE OF BEING SEPARATED and 1.) The STATE OF BEING
CONFLUENT are the two basic components of Being. Everythihg else is, in
final analisys, coming down to them, and is nothing more as only THEIR
COMBINATION. Correspondingly, the SUCCES IN SUCH BEING is belonging to
those who KNOW THE ART OF COMBINING THE TWO, or, in other words, -
translating it all to the language of the above-mentioned Two Principles
"SEPARATED" and "CONFLUENT", -
?----------------------------------------------------------------?
| 2.) Who "knows how" IN TIME TO SHOW ONE`S JAWS TO THE OTHER; ?-?-?
| 1.) Who "knows how" IN TIME to inter?COUPLE THE OTHER. ?-------?-Ч
?----------------------------------------------------------------… |
??--------------------------------------------------------------------?
??-? THE MOST VIVID SYMBOL OF "SEPARATION";
?-? THE MOST VIVID SYMBOL OF GETTING INTO THE "CONFLUENT JUNCTION"; -
of which the above-mentioned "kin" is continued; although we are meaning
MORAL CON?JUNCTION RATHER THAN PHYSICAL any other…)/…; - everything finally is coming to that, - as it is
IN THE WORLD OF THE BEASTS - for, such is the IMAGE OF THE BEAST.
And THERE IS NOTHING IN IT EXCEPT THAT (these Two Points). THERE IS
NOTHING ELSE IN THE BEING which is built accorting to the outlined here
IMAGE OF THE BEAST: When THESE TWO PASSIONS are R E A L L Y
C A P T U T I N G (from where the NAME OF MY PRESENT WORK REALLY CO-
MES), absorbing ENTIRE ATTENTION (so that such kind of "beast" SEES NOT-
HING ELSE…).
°±"?? 3.) But let`s nonetheless ask ourselves: Is there anything else
°±"?? in the being, which would be also WORTHY OF HUMAN BEING?!…
"The Capturing" calls it: The "U`n`c`o`n`c`e`i`v`a`b`l`e".
And if in the Capturing (or, in other words, SUCH KIND OF BE-
ING, THE PASSIONS OF WHICH ARE TRYING TO "CAPTURE") all things
are EITHER "CONFLUENT", or "SEPARATE"…, in the Unconceivable -
UNSEPARABLE and UNCONFLUENT.
And THIS IS THE MAJOR STATEMENT OF MY WORK "THE CAPTURING" (Nomber 3),
and the MAJOR DISCOVERY I MADE IN MY LIFE:
If in godless world all things are interrelated only according
to principle "Confluent and Separate"…, IN THE WORLD, HAVING
AT LEAST SOME RELATION to the above-it Unconceivable - they
are starting to change it to "UNSEPARABLE and UNCONFLUENT".
- And this way the Unconceivable can be conceived.
The words which we now say are not "simple words", but they are already
relating now to the Word, of Whom sais the Bible, for we now have ente-
red already (from that "demonic sphere" of which we have started) PURE
CHRISTIANITY. "You are to conceive a Child" - sais the Word of the Word.
Thus Unconceivable of the God is getting conceivable, thru Jesus Christ.
And that`s not all.
As the Christian Church started to reflect (namely - trying to con-
ceive -), how the NATURE OF HUMAN and the NATURE OF GOD were joined in
Jesus Christ, it came to the conclusion: "UNSEPARABLY and UNCONFLUENT-
LY"!; - what is representing a MAJOR CHRISTIAN DOGMAT (so that any devi-
ation from it is even called: HERESY, i.e., a "thing of this world",
reflecting the IMAGE OF THE BEAST, and not the Image of God).
It greatly influences the behaviour, coming out from these two
images (so, "heresy" - is not a "theoretical" thing; but is as
practical, as hardly anything else…). For:
If Human and God (Creator and the Creation) are really joined in Jesus
Christ namely that way…, it really opens way for joining everything else
in the world according such Image (with one another thru God: for, rela-
tion between the creation and God thru Jesus Christ is only "UNSEPARABLE
and UNCONFLUENT" - AS IS in Jesus Christ)… Such is the creative and mo-
ral message of my work "The Capturing" (the concrete examples are follo-
wed in its full Russian text).
* ------- *
+
This principle - "UNSEPARABLE and UNCONFLUENT" - which in "The Cap-
turing" is led out purely logically (see for that full Russian text of
"The Capturing") - had coinsided completely with the same-name Dogmatics
of Orthodox Christianity (usually ACCEPTED BY FAITH). Taking a new star-
ting poing of SUCH AN INSPIRING COINSIDENCE, it later continues its line
by alleging that:
?-----? 2.) Only God the Creator is QUITE POWERFULY of the "DIFFERING
| KIND" to Creation (see point 2);
?-?-----? 1.) Only He quite powerfully can give the "SAME KIND" to it.
| | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Страницы: 1, 2
